Major Evolutionary Transitions and the Roles of Facilitation and Information in Ecosystem Transformations

Robin, Amanda N. and Denton, Kaleda K. and Horna Lowell, Eva S. and Dulay, Tanner and Ebrahimi, Saba and Johnson, Gina C. and Mai, Davis and O’Fallon, Sean and Philson, Conner S. and Speck, Hayden P. and Zhang, Xinhui Paige and Nonacs, Peter (2021) Major Evolutionary Transitions and the Roles of Facilitation and Information in Ecosystem Transformations. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 9. ISSN 2296-701X

[thumbnail of pubmed-zip/versions/3/package-entries/fevo-09-711556-r2/fevo-09-711556.pdf] Text
pubmed-zip/versions/3/package-entries/fevo-09-711556-r2/fevo-09-711556.pdf - Published Version

Download (2MB)

Abstract

A small number of extraordinary “Major Evolutionary Transitions” (METs) have attracted attention among biologists. They comprise novel forms of individuality and information, and are defined in relation to organismal complexity, irrespective of broader ecosystem-level effects. This divorce between evolutionary and ecological consequences qualifies unicellular eukaryotes, for example, as a MET although they alone failed to significantly alter ecosystems. Additionally, this definition excludes revolutionary innovations not fitting into either MET type (e.g., photosynthesis). We recombine evolution with ecology to explore how and why entire ecosystems were newly created or radically altered – as Major System Transitions (MSTs). In doing so, we highlight important morphological adaptations that spread through populations because of their immediate, direct-fitness advantages for individuals. These are Major Competitive Transitions, or MCTs. We argue that often multiple METs and MCTs must be present to produce MSTs. For example, sexually-reproducing, multicellular eukaryotes (METs) with anisogamy and exoskeletons (MCTs) significantly altered ecosystems during the Cambrian. Therefore, we introduce the concepts of Facilitating Evolutionary Transitions (FETs) and Catalysts as key events or agents that are insufficient themselves to set a MST into motion, but are essential parts of synergies that do. We further elucidate the role of information in MSTs as transitions across five levels: (I) Encoded; (II) Epigenomic; (III) Learned; (IV) Inscribed; and (V) Dark Information. The latter is ‘authored’ by abiotic entities rather than biological organisms. Level IV has arguably allowed humans to produce a MST, and V perhaps makes us a FET for a future transition that melds biotic and abiotic life into one entity. Understanding the interactive processes involved in past major transitions will illuminate both current events and the surprising possibilities that abiotically-created information may produce.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: Eurolib Press > Multidisciplinary
Depositing User: Managing Editor
Date Deposited: 28 Jun 2023 04:16
Last Modified: 12 Oct 2023 05:51
URI: http://info.submit4journal.com/id/eprint/2207

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item