Sauppe, Sebastian and Choudhary, Kamal K. and Giroud, Nathalie and Blasi, Damián E. and Norcliffe, Elisabeth and Bhattamishra, Shikha and Gulati, Mahima and Egurtzegi, Aitor and Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina and Meyer, Martin and Bickel, Balthasar and Poeppel, David (2021) Neural signatures of syntactic variation in speech planning. PLOS Biology, 19 (1). e3001038. ISSN 1545-7885
![[thumbnail of journal.pbio.3001038.pdf]](http://info.submit4journal.com/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
journal.pbio.3001038.pdf - Published Version
Download (2MB)
Abstract
Planning to speak is a challenge for the brain, and the challenge varies between and within languages. Yet, little is known about how neural processes react to these variable challenges beyond the planning of individual words. Here, we examine how fundamental differences in syntax shape the time course of sentence planning. Most languages treat alike (i.e., align with each other) the 2 uses of a word like “gardener” in “the gardener crouched” and in “the gardener planted trees.” A minority keeps these formally distinct by adding special marking in 1 case, and some languages display both aligned and nonaligned expressions. Exploiting such a contrast in Hindi, we used electroencephalography (EEG) and eye tracking to suggest that this difference is associated with distinct patterns of neural processing and gaze behavior during early planning stages, preceding phonological word form preparation. Planning sentences with aligned expressions induces larger synchronization in the theta frequency band, suggesting higher working memory engagement, and more visual attention to agents than planning nonaligned sentences, suggesting delayed commitment to the relational details of the event. Furthermore, plain, unmarked expressions are associated with larger desynchronization in the alpha band than expressions with special markers, suggesting more engagement in information processing to keep overlapping structures distinct during planning. Our findings contrast with the observation that the form of aligned expressions is simpler, and they suggest that the global preference for alignment is driven not by its neurophysiological effect on sentence planning but by other sources, possibly by aspects of production flexibility and fluency or by sentence comprehension. This challenges current theories on how production and comprehension may affect the evolution and distribution of syntactic variants in the world’s languages.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Subjects: | Eurolib Press > Biological Science |
Depositing User: | Managing Editor |
Date Deposited: | 14 Mar 2023 08:21 |
Last Modified: | 07 Jun 2024 09:41 |
URI: | http://info.submit4journal.com/id/eprint/738 |